Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Acta Neurochir (Wien) ; 166(1): 130, 2024 Mar 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38467916

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The use of antithrombotic medication following acute flow diversion for a ruptured intracranial aneurysm (IA) is challenging with no current guidelines. We investigated the incidence of treatment-related complications and patient outcomes after flow diversion for a ruptured IA before and after the implementation of a standardized antithrombotic medication protocol. METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective study including consecutive patients treated for acutely ruptured IAs with flow diversion during 2015-2023. We divided the patients into two groups: those treated before the implementation of the protocol (pre-protocol) and those treated after the implementation of the protocol (post-protocol). The primary outcomes were hemorrhagic and ischemic complications. A secondary outcome was clinical outcome using the modified Ranking Scale (mRS). RESULTS: Totally 39 patients with 40 ruptured IAs were treated with flow diversion (69% pre-protocol, 31% post-protocol). The patient mean age was 55 years, 62% were female, 63% of aneurysms were in the posterior circulation, 92% of aneurysms were non-saccular, and 44% were in poor grade on admission. Treatment differences included the use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (pre-group 48% vs. post-group 100%), and the use of early dual antiplatelets (pre-group 44% vs. 92% post-group). The incidence of ischemic complications was 37% and 42% and the incidence of hemorrhagic complications was 30% and 33% in the pre- and post-groups, respectively, with no between-group differences. There were three (11%) aneurysm re-ruptures in the pre-group and none in the post-group. There were no differences in mortality or mRS 0-2 between the groups at 6 months. CONCLUSION: We found no major differences in the incidence of ischemic or hemorrhagic complications after the implementation of a standardized antithrombotic protocol for acute flow diversion for ruptured IAs. There is an urgent need for more evidence-based guidelines to optimize antithrombotic treatment after flow diversion in the setting of subarachnoid hemorrhage.


Assuntos
Aneurisma Roto , Embolização Terapêutica , Procedimentos Endovasculares , Aneurisma Intracraniano , Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Masculino , Aneurisma Intracraniano/tratamento farmacológico , Aneurisma Intracraniano/cirurgia , Aneurisma Intracraniano/etiologia , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Procedimentos Endovasculares/métodos , Aneurisma Roto/tratamento farmacológico , Aneurisma Roto/cirurgia , Aneurisma Roto/etiologia , Embolização Terapêutica/métodos , Protocolos Clínicos , Stents
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...